Wondering what the Royally-banned Mail on Sunday article was last week? This is the nitty-gritty of it.
The Internet is a wonderful thing.
UPDATE: The above link, I forgot to tell you, was found by simply watching Channel 4 News last night. The rumours, they said, were all over the place – even at this internet site… They then slowly told us the website address, in detail never usually handed to us. I think they’re a tad annoyed at the injunction served against the Guardian and the Mail on Sunday…
PLEASE NOTE – CROWNED SMILEY FACES HAVE BEEN INSERTED WHERE THE WORD ‘ALLEGEDLY’ SHOULD APPEAR
So, a servant 3:o) rapes another servant and Prince Charles 3:o) gets him off and 3:o) pays him off.
That same servant has also 3:o) been Prince Charles’ lover at least once. 3:o)
The Windsors have 3:o) diddled with the law once to keep a lid on this by calling a sudden halt to Burrell’s case and now they’re 3:o) diddling with the law again in a last ditch effort to shut everyone up.
At a time when the Church of England is having its big spilt over homosexuality, I can see this causing a few problems – but what it really comes down to is abuse of position. If it’s true.
Still, it’s hard to believe that after months of illegal war, the only thing that can get the masses to stand up and shout about something is another discussion about who sucked whose dick.
Very true, Manic, you always put it so eloquently…
And *legally*, Wibbler, *legally*….
;oP
REVOLUTION!
test:NO:if you believe that you believe everything.
use your power of logical reasoning.
charles is innocent.
Piffle
http://www.worldoftheuniversalhuman.com/forum/index.htm
Go to this web site to get the full details.
Cheers
STAYING AT MY NANNYS I AM UNABLE TO EMAIL THE COMPETITION IN TODAYS PAPER TO WIN A SLEEPOVER IN HAMLEYS.
EACH EMAIL COMES BACK AS NOT KNOWN.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP.
JOSH